JUVENILE DELINQUENCY
CRIJ/SOCI 4331

STUDY GUIDE

THE NATURE OF ADOLESCENCE AND DELINQUENCY

What is adolescence?
Relationship between physiological changes and behavior Timeless character of adolescence
Rites of passage

Ancient and premodern views of adolescence:

    Aristotle - Ancient Greece

    Middle Ages - high infant mortality, children treated as adults, often treated with indifference, wetnursed, apprenticed.
    Wealthy sons spent adolescence as pages in courts of noblemen.

    Changing perceptions of youth in 17th century:
    Church leaders, moralists, and teachers promoted the idea of children as weak and innocent and in need of protection,
        guidance, and instruction.
    Childhood considered a period of life characterized by protection and strict control, segregation from adult life, with special
        norms or rules for children's behavior.

Two famous books on childrearing:

John Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning Education 1693 Children are nonmoral creatures-tabula rasa
Most common method of correction - shame and guilt
Make friends of children in late teens; don't break their spirits. Young must submit to close supervision, adult
authority, strict discipline, vocational education.

Jean Jacques Rousseau's Emile 1762
Different levels of human development to be taken into
account in learning process. Emphasizes
"specialness" of each stage of development.
Begins with assumption that human nature is good;
human institutions are the cause of problems in society.
His educational plan centered on learning in and through the goodness of nature. He was an advocate of permissiveness in childrearing.

HISTORY OF U.S. JUVENILE JUSTICE

Colonial America - 17th Century

Family is the basic social and economic unit
Living in small, rural towns
Upbringing colored by strict religious beliefs about original sin; children believed to be flawed from moment of conception.
Control of family, church, community over colonial children was complete. No legal machinery necessary.
Whipping and caning were common punishments for children.
1646 Stubborn Child Law, Mass. Bay Colony - death penalty for disobedience; rarely used

18th Century America

No distinct legal category of "juvenile delinquency"
Reliance on English common law standard:
Under age 7 no legal responsibility
8-14 - presumed innocent unless proved otherwise
Over 14 - adult
No special legal machinery for children - family, apprenticeship, church, school serve as mechanism for social control.
Town officials could remove troublesome children from their homes and place them in others.
The punishment of certain status offenses became popular.

19th Century America

Vast transformation of life in U.S. - industrial revolution
Cities grew with influx of foreign immigrants and rural migrants.
Poor housing and high unemployment were common in urban areas.
Middle and upper classes saw urbanization and immigration as threat to social order.

Child Saving Movement (child welfare movement):
Houses of Refuge (many built in 1820's) and orphanages
were built to punish, correct, and substitute for family.
Ex parte Crouse 1838
parens patriae - the state as parent
Children placed in institutions which tried initially to replicate traditional family life.
Early rehabilitation of immigrant juvenile offenders stressed middle-class, rural values, and culture.
Large impersonal structures gradually took over role of community and church.
By 1850s criticisms of institutions mounted, attacking their prison-like character.
By 1870 demand for change led to closing of reform school - O'Connell v. Turner 1870 Social problem continued in last half of century as did attack on poor and immmigrant population.
Large reformatories were built after 1870's - generally considered to be failures as mechanism of social control and education.

Establishment of First Juvenile Court - Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899
invention of delinquency as a special category of illegal behavior.
juvenile offenses considered to constitute a separate and distinct category of offenses from those of adults.
On the recommendation of the Chicago Women's Club, the Illinois State Conference of Charities, and the Chicago Bar Association, the juvenile court bill was passed by the legislature in 1899.
By 1923 almost every state passed similar laws.
The juvenile court promoted juvenile court procedures, probation, juvenile treatment facilities and juvenile institutions.


Crime & Delinquency in the United States

Study Guide

Siegel & Senna, Chapter Two

Between 1960 and 1981 crime skyrocketed from 3.3 million crimes reported to the police to 13.4 million crimes. After four years of decline (1981 to 1984), the rate went up in 1985 and continued to increase for the remainder of the decade. As the 1990’s began, the overall crime rate began to stabilize and decline. In 2000 the crime index total (Part I offenses) was 20% less than in 1990. FBI estimate that about 11.6 million serious crimes occurred in 2000, more than 4,000 per 100,000 inhabitants. Overall decline, but millions of crimes occur each year.

According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report (official statistics) for 2000, a total of about 14 million arrests were made. Of these, 2 million were for serious Part I crimes and 12 million for less serious Part II crimes. In 2000 juveniles were about 17% of all arrests. Juveniles accounted for about 28% of all index crimes (Part I – serious offenses).

Juveniles under the age of 18 are about 8% of the population, but are responsible for about 16% of violent crime arrests (65,000) and about 33% (345,000) of the property crime arrests.

The Uniform Crime Report - Official Statistics

2 million arrests of juveniles under 18 years of age (19% of all arrests)

560,000 juveniles arrested for Part I crimes

1.1 million juveniles arrested for Part II crimes

Part II arrests of juveniles (1.1 m) included:

93,000 for running away

101,000 for liquor law violations

106,000 for curfew violations

Property crime arrests peak at age 16; violent crime arrests peak at age 18. Crime rates begin to decline dramatically at age 24.

Juvenile Crime Trends

Arrests for violent juvenile crime began to increase in 1989, peaked in 1994, and then began to fall.

Juvenile murder rates doubled between 1980 and 1993, but they have since been in decline. More than 1700 youths were arrested for murder in 1997 and another 3800 for rape. But by 2000 the number arrested for murder had declined to about 806 and for rape to 2,937. A dramatic decline in juvenile violence!

The juvenile crime rate has been related to deep seated racial, gender, ethnic, and class conflict in American society, urban problems, economic deterioration, proliferation of weapons and drugs; growth of teenage gangs. In addition, more victims appear to be reporting crime to the police. Between 1987 and 1997 the number of youths arrested on weapons charges rose more than 100%.

Almost 15 million youth now live in poverty, and this figure is expected to increase over the next 15 years. The number of juveniles in the population will increase by 15 percent (9 million) between now and 2010. Those at high risk ages (15-17) will increase by more than 3 million, or 31 percent. There are 50 million school-age children in the US.

Self-Report Data

Delinquency is almost universal. Patterns of reported delinquency have remained stable since 1975, with the exception of assault. Property crime rates may actually be in decline. But self-report data do not include rape and murder.

According to 2000 self-report data from the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, the most common juvenile offenses are: truancy, drinking alcohol, using a false ID, shoplifting or larceny under $50, fighting, using marijuana, and damaging the property of others.

12% hurt someone badly enough so victim required medical care

30 stole something worth less than $50

13% stole something worth more than $50

28% shoplifted

14% damaged school property

High school students commit 1.05 million armed robberies per year according to self-report data, but the UCR tallies 400,000 armed robberies for all age groups!

The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)

According to victims’ reports, approximately 25 million crimes occur annually in the US - crimes of violence (assault, rape, robbery) and household victimizations (burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft). Victimization rates seem to be stable or declining for all categories of crime. The NCVS reveals that many crimes go unreported: more than 1/2 of violent crimes, 3/4 of personal crimes of theft, and 2/3 of household victimizations (burglary, larceny, vehicle theft).

The likelihood of victimization declines with age. Young teens are more than 20 times more likely to be the victim of a crime than people over age 65. The pattern holds for rape, aggravated assault, robbery.

Male teens have a significantly higher chance of victimization than female teens. African-American teenagers have a greater chance of becoming a victim of violent crime than white teenagers of the same age.

Youths tend to be victimized by their age group peers. In addition, most victimization is intraracial: black on black, white on white. Most teens are victimized by people they know or are acquainted with, and their victimization is more likely to occur during the day. Many victimizations occur at school.

80% of 12 year-olds in the US will become victims of violent crimes, 99% will experience theft, 40% will be injured during the course of the crime.

Gender and Delinquency

Official statistics suggest that males are significantly more criminal and delinquent than females. UCR data show that the teenage gender ratio for serious violent crime arrests is approximately 6 to 1, and for property crime approximately 2.5 to 1, male to female. However, the number and rate of female arrests have been increasing faster than that for males. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of arrests of males decreased about 3%, the number of females arrested increased almost 25%. The change in serious violent crime arrests was more striking: Male rates decreased 23% and female rates increased 28%.

Girls (58%) are more likely than boys (42%) to be arrested for being runaways.

Self-report data support that female delinquency is much higher than previously expected, and that the overall pattern of delinquency for males and females is quite similar. But males are still more likely to be “frequently delinquent” than females and more likely to engage in serious felony-type acts.

Racial and Ethnic Patterns

There are approximately 38 million white and 7.5 million African-American youths aged 5 - 17 in the US, a ratio of about 5:1. African-American youths are arrested for a disproportionate number of serious crimes (murder, rape, robbery, and assault), and white youths are arrested for a disproportionate share of arsons and alcohol-related offenses. However, self-report data indicate that the delinquent behavior of both groups is generally similar and that differences in arrest statistics may indicate a differential treatment policy by police and courts. Recent research reveals that poor male ethnic minorities are more likely to be arrested than white, female, and affluent suspects. Studies suggest that juvenile courts may punish minority youth more severely than white youths.

Social Class and Delinquency

Official delinquency data suggest that social class is a significant predictor of delinquency. Juvenile arrest rates are highest in areas that are economically deprived and socially disorganized. However, self-report studies found that socioeconomic class was related to official processing (chances of arrest and incarceration) by police, court, and correctional agencies, but not to the actual commission of delinquent acts.

Age and Delinquency

Age is inversely related to criminality. While 13-17 year olds make up 10% of the population, they account for about 27% of index crime arrests, 17% of all arrests. In contrast, adults 45 and older, who make up 32% of the population only account for 10% of arrests. People age out of crime. Self-reported rates for crimes like assault, gang fighting, robbery, stealing, and trespass decline substantially between the ages of 17 and 23.

The Chronic Juvenile Offender

Delinquency in a Birth Cohort

Findings of the Marvin Wolfgang’s 1972 study (Cohort I) of 9,945 boys born in Philadelphia in 1945, followed through age 18:

1/3 of the cohort had some police contact; 2/3 had none. Race was the most significant predictor of police contact. 54% of Wolfgang’s delinquent youth were repeat offenders, 46% were one-time offenders. The repeaters were categorized as nonchronic and chronic recidivists. 35.6% of all delinquents were nonchronic and thus had been arrested fewer than five but at least one time. The chronic recidivists were 18% of the delinquents, 6% of the sample. The chronic 6% were responsible for 51.9% of all offenses: 71% of the homicides, 73% of the rapes, 82% of the robberies, 69% of the aggravated assaults. About 1/3 of the boys had some police contact, 2/3 had none.

Findings of the Cohort II study of boys born in Philadelphia in 1958, followed through age 18:

The proportion of delinquent youths was larger. But offending patterns were similar. Racial differences were less apparent. But minority youth were still more delinquent. Crime was more serious than in earlier cohort. Chronic delinquents made up 7.5% of the sample (compared with 6.3% of the earlier cohort), 23% of all delinquent offenders (compared with 18% of earlier cohort).

Continuity of Crime - chronic juvenile offenders continue their law-violating careers as adults. The policy implications of these findings are a cause for concern among professionals who feel get-tough on crime legislation is wrong-headed. Efforts to predict individual cases of juvenile offending have proven unreliable.

Delinquency Through the Life Course

Events and experiences encountered as a child matures influence the direction and frequency of antisocial behavior. Stable work and intact marriages help people to desist from crime. Those who had bad experiences with justice system are stigmatized with negative labels and have difficulties as a result in family life and employment. Educational failure encourages delinquency.

Policy Implications

Early identification can promote rather than inhibit careers. Should steps be taken to control the chronic deviant offender? Should we use mandatory incarceration and waiver to adult court?

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1997 Update on Violence

Three separate sources report declines in the level of violent crime committed by juveniles between 1994 and 1995 - 17% in the number of homicide arrests involving juveniles, 25% in the number of violent crimes by juveniles reported by surveyed victims, and a 3% decline in the overall juvenile violent crime arrest rate.

The FBI Uniform Crime Reports on juvenile arrests for violent index offenses of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault show a 9.2% decline from 1995-1996 in juvenile violent crime arrest rates.

Between 1985 and 1995 nearly 25,000 juveniles were murdered in the US - 2600 in 1995.

1/3 of all murders of juveniles in the US in 1995 occurred in 10 counties. The major cities in these ten counties (beginning with the city in the county with the most murdered juveniles) are Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Detroit, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, San Bernardino, Philadelphia, and St. Louis.

For every two youths (ages 0-19) murdered in 1994, one youth committed suicide.

In 1994, the rate of violent victimization of juveniles ages 12 through 17 was nearly 3 times that of adults.

The number of children identified as abused or neglected almost doubled between 1986 and 1993.

Child protective service agencies received 2 million reports of child maltreatment in 1994.

Homicides by juveniles peaked in 1994 -- in 1995 firearm homicides by black males declined.

Half of high school students who carried a weapon (gun, knife, or club) took that weapon to school. 10% of high school students had carried a weapon on school property in the past month. In a year, 1 in 12 high schoolers were threatened or injured with a weapon at school. Fear of school-related violence kept 5% of high schoolers home at least once in the past month.

Victims reported a 25% drop in violent crimes by juveniles in 1995 -- violence by adults was down 18%.

About 1 in 7 juvenile arrests in 1995 was for a crime involving violence or the threat of violence.

After consistently increasing from 1985 to 1994, the juvenile violent crime arrest rate declined in 1995.

Today’s juvenile doesn’t commit more acts of violence than a generation ago, but more juveniles are violent.

Juveniles, even juvenile gang members, are most likely to commit violent crimes after school.

Juvenile arrestees are more likely than adult arrestees to have used a gun in committing a crime.

Study finds a pervasive trend to “crack down on juvenile crime” among State legislatures. In all states, juveniles can be transferred to criminal court -- most have multiple transfer mechanisms. From 1992 through 1995, 41 States passed laws making it easier for juveniles to be tried as adults. The number of cases judicially waived nationwide increased 71% from 1985 through 1994. The proportion of younger juveniles (under age 16) has increased.

Compared with 1985, cases waived in 1994 involved a greater proportion of person offense cases (44% vs. 33%) and drug cases (11% vs. 5%). Cases involving black youth were more likely to be waived than were cases involving white youth. Among white juveniles the cases most likely to be waived were person offenses. Among black juveniles, drug cases surpassed person offense cases in terms of likelihood of waiver.

Juvenile courts handled a growing number of violent cases and were tougher on them than on other cases. Robbery and aggravated assault cases were more common than cases of other serious violence.

California, Ohio, and Texas together held nearly 40% of juveniles in public custody facilities.

Almost 70% of public facility residents were held in facilities operating above their design capacity (overcrowded facilities).

Minority youth were overrepresented in custody facilities given their share of the general population.

In 1995, 32% of the US population ages 10-17 was classified as minorities. Minorities made up 68% of the detention center population in early 1995. Their proportion had risen from 65% of the detention center population in 1991 and 53% in 1983.

Similarly, the minority proportion of juveniles in custody in public long-term institutions (such as training schools), rose from 56% in 1983 to 69% in 1991. In 1995 the minority proportion in these facilities leveled off at 68% after the federal government required states to reduce the number of minorities (The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1992).

The number of youth under 18 in jails rose 20% from 1994-1995. Most were convicted or awaiting trial as adult criminal offenders.


 


Siegel & Senna, Chapter 4
Social Structure Theories: Social Disorganization,
Strain, and Cultural Deviance
Study Guide

What is a theory?

Social stratification - economic, policical, prestige
The relationship between social structure and delinquency

The Branches of Social Structure Theory
    Social Disorganization
    Strain
    Cultural Deviance

Social Disorganization Theory
    Oscar Lewis' "Culture of Poverty"
    The Area Studies of Shaw & McKay (The Chicago School)
            concentric zones
            transitional neighborhoods
            cultural transmission
            value conflict
    The Social Ecology of Delinquency
        Most significant areas of research:
            relative deprivation; community change;
            wealth and opportunity; fear; social controls;
            rage, distrust, and hopelessness

Strain Theory
    Emile Durkheim's Concept of Anomie
    Robert Merton's Theory of Anomie
        Social Adaptations:
                conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, rebellion
Robert Agnew's General Strain Theory
        3 sources of strain:
                failure to achieve positively valued goals
                the removal of positively valued stimuli from the individual
                presentation of negative stimuli
        Negative affective states - especially anger
                strain as a trigger of anti-social behavior
        Coping with strain:  cognitive and behavioral solution

Cultural Deviance/Subcultural Theories
    Development of subcultural theory

    Walter Miller's Theory of Lower-Class Culture Conflict
        Lower-class focal concerns: trouble, toughness,
        excitement, smartness, fate, autonomy, belonging, status

    Albert Cohen's Theory of Delinquent Subcultures
                Causes of delinquency
                Middle-class measuring rods
                Ascribed and acquired status
                Reactions to middle-class measuring rods:
                    corner boy, delinquent boy, college boy
                    short-run hedonism, reaction formation (p. 165)

    Cloward & Ohlin's Opportunity Theory
               Differential opportunity
               Gang subcultures
                    criminal gangs, conflict gangs, retreatist gangs

Social Structural Theory and Delinquency Prevention
               community organization
                educational and job opportunities


Juvenile Delinquency Examination Two
Study Guide

Siegel and Senna, Chapter 5
SOCIAL PROCESS THEORIES

Socialization and delinquency

Learning Theories

Sutherland's Differential Association Theory
crime as a politically defined construct
culture conflict
differential association: when two cultures impinge on the individual
19 principles of differential association

Akers' Differential Reinforcement Theory
Sykes and Matza's Drift Theory/Neutralization Theory techniques of neutralization:
denial of responsibility,
denial of injury
denial of victim
condemnation of the condemners
appeal to higher loyalties

Control Theories

Reckless's Containment Theory
inner containments, outer containments, internal pushes, external pressures, external pulls

Hirschi's Social Control Theory
Why don't people commit crime?
four elements of the social bond:a
ttachment, commitment, involvement, belief

Integrated Theories

Joseph Weis's Social Development Theory
integrates features of social control theory and social structural approach
positive relationship between community organization and social control
less effective social control in neighborhoods with weak families and resources

Elliott's Integrated Theory
integrates strongest features of strain, social learning, and control theories into single model
youths develop weak bonds with society because of perceptions of strain, inadequate socialization, and living in socially disorganized areas.


Study Guide
Siegel & Senna
Chapter 6

Social Reaction Theories: Labeling & Conflict

Labeling Theory
Applying Labels
Who Defines Deviance?
The Effect of Labeling
Primary and Secondary Deviance
Discrimination in the Labeling Process
Evaluation of Labeling Theory

Social Conflict Theory
The Emergence of Critical Criminology
The Branches of Conflict Theory
Elements of Social Conflict Theory: Marxist thought
The Conflict Concept of Delinquency

Richard Quinney's major premises:
Crime is a definition of conduct created by agents in a politically organized society.
Criminal definitions describe behaviors that conflict with interests of dominant segments in society.
Criminal definitions are applied by those who have power to shape the enforcement and administration of criminal law.

Gresham Sykes's concept of Marxist criminology:
The "haves" impose morality and standards of good behavior on the rest of society.
They protect their property and safety from "have-nots," even though the cost may be high in terms of legal rights of those perceived as a threat.
The definition of criminal behavior includes behavior that might threaten the status quo.
The elite draws the middle class into this pattern of control, leading it to believe it has a stake in maintaining status quo.

Demystification of Law

Social Reaction Theories and Delinquency Prevention

Restorative Justice


Juvenile Delinquency

Spring 2005

Information on Final Examination

To prepare for the final, follow the study guides for examinations one and two. In addition, see the study guide below for Siegel and Senna, Chapters 8, 9, and 11, and finish Jonathan Kozol's book, Amazing Grace. (Approximately 1/3 of the examination will focus on material covered in prior examinations.)

 

Guest Speakers

Charles Tamez & Cinda Libus, Community Educators, and teen moms from Planned

Parenthood of South Texas

George Vela, Counselor, Jeff Villanueva, Intern, and residents of Texas Youth

Commission's York House

Ray High School, Texan Tribunal

Counselor Holly Hackfeld, Behaviorist Yvonne Gonzales, and female residents of

Shoreline, Inc., Taft, Texas

Unit Director, Anna Zarling and male residents of Shoreline, Inc., Taft, Texas

 

Films

House of Tomorrow

Creation of Childhood

Youth Terror: View from Behind the Gun - New York

Children of Violence: A Barrio Family in Oakland

Gang Banging in Little Rock

 

Field Trips

Huntsville, Texas - Sam Houston State University, Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, Estelle Unit, Walls Unit, Cemetery

Federal Prison at Three Rivers, Texas

Children of Children exhibit at the Texas Museum of Science & History

 

The Family and Delinquency

Chapter 8 (skip pp. 297-305)

The Changing American Family

The Family's Influence on Delinquency

broken homes

family conflict

family neglect

discipline and supervision

family size and structure

family criminality

Child Abuse and Neglect

history and definitions

extent: reported and unreported

causes

social class and substance abuse

sexual abuse

abuse, neglect, and delinquency

the family and delinquency prevention

 

Peers and Delinquency: Juvenile Gangs and Groups

Chapter 9

Adolescent Peer Relations

peer relations and delinquency

groupthink

Teenage Gangs

what are they?

studies of juvenile gangs

from the 1920's to the present

contemporary gangs:

location, gender, formation, leadership, communication, criminality, ethnic and racial composition

Why do youth join gangs?

anthropological view, social disorganization/sociocultural view,

psychological view, rational choice view

Controlling gang activity

Schools and Delinquency

Chapter 10

The School in Modern American Society

Academic Performance and Delinquency

School Failure

causes, tracking, alienation, irrelevant curriculum,

student subculture, cheating, dropping out

Delinquency in the School

 

Drugs and Delinquency

Chapter 11

Substances of Abuse

in particular: alcohol, marijuana, crack, inhalants

Drug Use Today

Why Do Kids Use Drugs?

social disorganization, peer pressure, family factors, genetic factors,

emotional problems

Drug Use and Delinquency

Drug Control Strategies

education, community, treatment

What Does the Future Hold?